Police cracking down on distracted drivers

Want to convert your Onstar to Bluetooth using BlueStar 2010

  • Yes [url]www.bluestar2010.com[/url]

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 50.0%

  • Total voters
    4
It's not that big of a deal. Use Bluetooth or something similar, or wait until you aren't driving to answer your phone. Cell phones aren't the only thing considered a "distraction". Eating, drinking, adjusting the radio, pretty much everything's considered a distraction. Bluetooth doesn't solve common sense.
 
It's not that big of a deal. Use Bluetooth or something similar, or wait until you aren't driving to answer your phone. Cell phones aren't the only thing considered a "distraction". Eating, drinking, adjusting the radio, pretty much everything's considered a distraction. Bluetooth doesn't solve common sense.
:agree:
Yes your right on that...there are lots of distractions and all you need is just good common sense...
 
If I answer my phone I make a living. Yes I have bluetooth in my vehicle, is it always on no, but I will still take the call, so call me bad I don't care I'm tired of bull$hit laws and I'm tired of spam on this site. This guy came to this site with 3 threads of spam as his intro..........turf this $hit. Yes rant is over.
 
Glad to hear someone voice an honest reply. Not like the others weren't but not too often do people admit that they go against the flow.

My opinion on some laws (and not the forum's opinion) is that although it has been shown that using a cell while driving does affect your reaction time and ability to drive, it doesn't affect all people the same way. I'm sure there are some people who can drive and stay focused on the road while driving and then there are others who can't and are an absolute danger. So the law as I see it isn't there because everyone who uses a cell while driving is going to cause an accident or is a danger but to keep the people who can't handle doing the two things at once from doing it. The same can be said for a lot of other things such as driving over the speed limit. Some people can and can handle the extra speed and are able to avoid trouble, some people think they can but really can't and either cause trouble or are unable to avoid it, and others know their limitations and just move along....etc, etc.

*Posted while doing 95 mph on my smart phone through a school zone... field...fence....barn...chicken...*
 
Glad to hear someone voice an honest reply. Not like the others weren't but not too often do people admit that they go against the flow.

My opinion on some laws (and not the forum's opinion) is that although it has been shown that using a cell while driving does affect your reaction time and ability to drive, it doesn't affect all people the same way. I'm sure there are some people who can drive and stay focused on the road while driving and then there are others who can't and are an absolute danger. So the law as I see it isn't there because everyone who uses a cell while driving is going to cause an accident or is a danger but to keep the people who can't handle doing the two things at once from doing it. The same can be said for a lot of other things such as driving over the speed limit. Some people can and can handle the extra speed and are able to avoid trouble, some people think they can but really can't and either cause trouble or are unable to avoid it, and others know their limitations and just move along....etc, etc.

*Posted while doing 95 mph on my smart phone through a school zone... field...fence....barn...chicken...*

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top